Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Sentry’s job is to tell you when your app breaks. To do that, we group individual errors into issues. First by fingerprinting, which lexically matches errors based on their structure, then by an AI fallback: when fingerprinting can’t find a match, an ML model compares the new error’s stacktrace against existing issues and merges it if they’re semantically similar.

Sentry Snapshots diffs screenshots on every commit and blocks the PR if there are any visual changes so you can confirm they’re intentional. Users don’t interact with code, they interact with something they can see and touch. Snapshots gives you a lightweight way to test it. It’s easier than ever to change code. It’s also easier than ever to trade quality for speed. Modern codebases need guardrails to ensure correctness.

Sentry’s SDK teams maintain and support SDKs for a vast ecosystem of languages and frameworks. See our release registry for a source of truth. We’re currently at 159 published packages across the entire ecosystem. If you use it, we probably support it. All of these SDKs are open source and have their own GitHub repositories that we maintain on a daily basis. And like any other open source project, we get tons of bug reports and issues on these.

When should I reach for a log, a trace, or a metric? I hit that question constantly when I instrument code, and I watch coding agents hit it too. It sounds like it should be obvious. Errors, traces, logs, and metrics are the four kinds of telemetry most apps run on, four tools in one box, and they overlap enough that the honest answer is every developer’s favourite: it depends. You can stuff context into span attributes instead of logging it. You can count log events instead of emitting a metric.

At Sentry, we’re obsessed with things not breaking. It’s kind of our whole deal. But for a while, our own marketing site was testing that obsession. Much of what you see on sentry.io (the marketing site, blog, open source microsite, etc.) were running on a fleet of legacy Gatsby sites powered by a traditional headless CMS. On paper, it worked.

You already instrumented the backend with OpenTelemetry. Your services emit spans. Your teams know the OTel APIs. Maybe you already run a Collector. So when you start evaluating Sentry, the obvious question is: Do you need to replace your OpenTelemetry setup with the Sentry SDK? No. The practical answer is usually: keep OpenTelemetry where it already works, add the Sentry SDK where it gives you more application context, and send OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) events to Sentry.

Agents are getting better and better at fixing bugs. They’re even getting better at testing their work, thanks to headless browsers, sandboxes, simulators, etc. But what about the bugs that only show up once you bring in different browsers, languages, extensions, internet speeds, and all the other variables that get mixed in the second you ship to prod? Or all the bugs that only show up when you account for… well, humans being humans and doing weird stuff you didn’t expect them to do?

You already have everything you need. If you’re using Sentry, you have traces, structured logs, and now application metrics. Most teams use that stuff for debugging and stop there. But get this: that same data can answer most of the product questions you’ve been sending to a separate analytics tool, maintained by a separate team, with a separate data model and a separate bill. (Not all of them.