Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Not All AI Tools Will Survive the Shakeout

Not every AI tool has staying power, and the ones that last are the ones that fit your organization’s strategy. AI is following the same arc as the cloud push and the dot-com era: a massive boom, then a contraction. Before you invest, ask what will actually make a difference in your org, and build from there. Watch the full IT Leadership Lab session — linked above.

Elastic Introduces Elastic nightshift AI SRE to Investigate with the Full Context Others Can't Afford to Keep

The AI SRE uses complete context from across the entire stack to continuously detect issues and learn from every incident, delivering evidence-backed answers engineers can trust.

Meet Rosetta

During an incident, the answers an engineer needs are spread across tools. Telemetry sits in one place, configurations in another, and tickets in a third. Building a complete picture means knowing which tool holds which piece and how to query each one, usually under time pressure. Rosetta is the conversational interface for Selector Foundry, the agentic NetOps platform built on Selector’s existing AIOps and Observability solution.

How AI agents help teams deliver better digital experiences

The moment your page slows down, two clocks start. One is yours: time to alert, time to investigate, time to fix. The other belongs to the user staring at the slow page. Yours is measured in minutes. Theirs runs out in seconds. That gap is what AI agents close. Zia Agents in OpManager Nexus detects an issue, works out the cause, and runs the fix on its own, often before your users feel a thing. This blog looks at how that changes the experience you deliver.

When AI agents ignore the code freeze: governance that holds | EVOLVE 2026

AI can write 1,100 lines of code for a loading spinner in five minutes. Your change board still meets once a week. Karthik Jayaraman, VP of Information Technology at Fiserv, explains what happens when code generation speeds up and everything downstream stays the same. He covers why "human in the loop" doesn't scale, why handing all review to AI backfires, and why an agent told not to touch production needs a boundary it can't cross, not just an instruction.

AI is making software delivery less stable. DORA's Nathen Harvey on the fix | EVOLVE 2026

DORA's data shows that as AI adoption goes up, individual effectiveness rises, and so does software delivery instability: more rollbacks and more unplanned rework. Nathen Harvey of Google's DORA team explains why AI acts as an amplifier of whatever system you already have. He walks through the seven capabilities that separate teams getting real gains from teams drowning in downstream chaos. He also argues that the risks stopping you from shipping AI-built work should become your platform roadmap.

Shipped: Project this month's AI cost before the invoice closes

The question comes up on the 10th, the 15th, and again on the 25th. Where is AI spend going to end up this month? The invoice won’t tell you until it’s closes, and by then there’s nothing left to forecast. “If I’m looking at this on the 15th, I want to know where we’re going to land.” That’s how a finance lead put it during a persona session in September, and it’sthe whole job. You have half a month of real usage behind you.

Claude Opus pricing in 2026: every model, every rate, and whether it's worth it

Claude Opus pricing is $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens on Claude Opus 5.5, the current model, with cache reads at $0.20 and batch jobs at $2/$10. Opus 5 and the legacy 4-series bill at $5/$25. The 1M context window carries no surcharge. Every Opus model Anthropic shipped in 2026 held the same line: $5 in, $25 out, per million tokens. Opus 4.6 in February, 4.7 in April, 4.8 in May, Opus 5 in July. Four releases, one price. On September 22, 2026, the line broke.