Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Monitoring is built around the system a team understands at a point in time. Engineers add endpoints, move dependencies, and change user flows every day. Over time, that creates coverage drift as monitors keep reflecting the system as it used to behave, while changing paths introduce failure modes that teams didn’t yet know to watch for. Bits Detection automatically creates, tunes, and maintains monitors for your services.

Teams are wiring AI coding agents straight to their warehouse over MCP and asking things like “What was our revenue by channel in Q2?” The agent finds a revenue table, runs a query, and returns a number in seconds, with no waiting on the data team. While the answer initially looks right, the problem is that the number is often wrong.

In this article we’ll show how we built an image search demo in Aiven Apps. The demo uses the CLIP Large Multimodal Model (LMM) to turn a user’s text prompts into a vector that can be compared with the precomputed vectors for a corpus of images, allowing the user to find images based on their text. While in this example the LMM input (the text prompt) is coming from the user, the principle is the same as for an internally generated query.

Enterprise AI struggles not from inadequate models, but from fragmented data architecture. Critical business data remains trapped in legacy systems or lost in streaming complexity. Success requires bridging the gap between modern intelligence layers and underlying systems of record.

Something unusual happened in the first half of 2026: the most productive AI coding tool on the market became the most financially dangerous. And the companies that discovered this the hard way read like a Fortune 50 roll call.

Your engineers run Claude Code. Your designers are in Cowork. Half the company has Claude open in a browser tab, and a few are on Cursor. It’s on their laptops, each person authenticated a different way, and none of it touches your gateway. The only record you get is one lump-sum bill at the end of the month. Now you can capture it where it happens – on the laptop.

This edition of the Pulse is shifting lanes. We’re calling it the AI Economics Pulse now, because the question on every finance leader’s mind is whether AI spend and the returns on it can be made to pair at all. That question came to a head over the last few weeks. The bills came due, and they came due in public. Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in four months and capped employee spending on Claude Code and Cursor at $1,500 a month.

AI changed how code gets written before it changed how code gets operated. Generation accelerated; the downstream controls that turn that output into reliable, secure software at a reasonable cost did not keep pace. The result is elevated risk, distributed unevenly across engineering organizations. A recent survey explains why the distribution is so uneven.