Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

AI can't correlate what was never standardized

Steve Flanders (Senior Director of Engineering, Splunk) makes the case that AI can't save an observability stack that never agreed on a standard. Mix formats across metrics and logs, and AI stops correlating and starts guessing, which means you either make the wrong call or miss the answer you actually needed. OpenTelemetry is one fix, but Prometheus and Fluentd work too. The standard matters more than which one you pick.

A practical guide to risk-based code review

Traditional code review no longer keeps pace with how much code teams are shipping. Risk-based code review is the response: instead of giving every pull request the same scrutiny, you route human attention by risk, letting low-risk changes ship with light or automated review and reserving deep human review for the changes that are expensive to get wrong.

Just ask AI to add OpenTelemetry to your code

OpenTelemetry instrumentation used to mean hours of manual work, wiring up metrics service by service. Now you can just ask for it. Tell an AI agent what you're trying to observe, something like "add OpenTelemetry so I can track this application's performance," and it turns that into an intent specification, then enriches your existing code with instrumentation to match. OpenTelemetry is open source and on GitHub. Pairing it with an AI agent that actually understands your codebase is what turns "add some metrics" into instrumentation that's useful.