Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

The catastrophic TeamPCP exploit in March 2026 demonstrated that "open execution" models, in which third-party code runs with full privileges, have made CI/CD pipelines a primary target for global credential harvesting. There are better architectures. On March 19th, the risks of running open execution pipelines — where what code runs in your CI/CD environment is largely uncontrolled — went from theoretical to catastrophic.

This comprehensive guide covers the fundamentals of load testing, key differences from stress and performance testing, step-by-step execution methods, popular tools, and best practices to help teams build resilient systems with confidence. In today's always-on digital economy, a single slow page or unexpected crash during peak traffic can cost businesses thousands or even millions of dollars in lost revenue, damaged reputation, and frustrated customers.

Taking a look back over the last ten years in enterprise technology, paradigm shifts are occurring more frequently. For example, the maturity of DevOps/Platform Engineering and Cloud Native infrastructure has occurred. The new frontier depending where you are in adoption is AI. As your adoption and maturity curve progress, operationalizing these paradigms become important.

On March 24, 2026, the AI open-source ecosystem was impacted by a critical supply chain attack involving the widely used Python package LiteLLM. Attackers compromised the LiteLLM PyPI distribution pipeline and published malicious versions (notably in the 1.82.7-1.82.8 range), embedding a multi-stage payload designed to steal credentials and execute remote code.

You're tagging Docker images with build numbers. -Build is your latest production release on main. A developer pushes a hotfix to release-v2.1, that run becomes build. -Another merges to develop, build. A week later someone asks: "What build number are we on for production?" You check the registry. -You see,,, on main. The numbers in between? Scattered across feature branches that may never ship. Your build numbers have stopped telling a useful story.

For the past few years, the narrative around Artificial Intelligence has been dominated by what I like to call the "magic box" illusion. We assumed that deploying AI simply meant passing a user’s question through an API key to a Large Language Model (LLM) and waiting for a brilliant answer.

--- Key Takeaway: Harness AI helped deflect 95% of the platform support tickets for a major financial institution --- These days, success is often measured by what doesn’t happen: When things go right, the software delivery platform is invisible. But what happens when an organization’s delivery velocity increases multifold? Can the platform still stay out of the way?

Modern engineering teams run on CI/CD. It’s where pull requests get validated, artifacts get produced, and releases get promoted to production. That also makes CI/CD migration very risky because you're not just moving a "tool"; you're moving the workflow that developers use dozens or hundreds of times a day. The good news: disruption is optional.

Modern software teams are under constant pressure to ship faster without breaking production. That’s why CI/CD best practices have become essential for high-performing DevOps organizations. Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) help automate builds, testing, and deployments — but simply installing a pipeline tool isn’t enough. Without the right practices, pipelines become slow, flaky, and difficult to govern.

‍Flaky tests are automated tests that pass or fail inconsistently without changes to the code. In this guide, you’ll learn why flaky tests happen, how to detect them automatically in CI pipelines, and how modern platforms prevent them from slowing teams down. Your test went well three times yesterday. It didn't work this morning. You ran it again without changing anything, and now it works. Congratulations, you've just passed a flaky test, and now someone's day is going to be ruined.