Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

The latest News and Information on DevOps, CI/CD, Automation and related technologies.

Cost Per Outcome: AI Cost Management in Harness | Harness Blog

Companies are shipping AI features at a pace cloud teams have rarely seen. New agents, new copilots, new flows powered by language models, all moving from prototype to production in weeks. The spend that comes with it is real and accelerating, and most teams are seeing it on the invoice before they see it anywhere else. The question is no longer how much you're spending on AI. It's whether each dollar is producing a real outcome, and whether you can govern that spend before the next invoice arrives.

Where to find lost engineering time in your delivery pipeline

If your infrastructure is configured outside version control through dashboards, scripts, or manual steps, environment drift is the expected outcome. Most teams have lived this scenario. A feature works in staging but breaks in production. Two hours later, someone finds a configuration setting that was changed in staging three weeks ago and never documented.

We're releasing the financial control plane for AI spend

Gartner forecasts $2.6 trillion in global AI spend this year. Most of it lands in invoices that don’t connect dollars to the developers who spent them, the customers they served, or the features they shipped. AI billing is a mess. CloudZero is the financial control plane for AI spend. Three capabilities, available today, reveal the by-customer, feature, and developer ROI of AI: 1. Real-time Spend: Capture every dollar spent on AI, at the source. 2.

AI spend is exploding. Most companies cannot prove ROI.

Only 14% of CFOs can prove AI ROI. OpenAI’s gross margin fell from 40% to 33% in 2025, well below its 46% target. Even the AI providers cannot reliably predict what AI will cost. Companies are scaling AI faster than they can measure it: more tokens, more agents, more model calls, more spend moving through systems finance cannot yet see. Every board is asking the same question: What is this AI investment returning? Most companies cannot answer it. The ones that can will compound their advantage.

Are AI Tools Actually Improving Developer Experience? (Experts Cut Through the Hype)

AI tools are spreading across the entire software development lifecycle - but are they actually making developers more productive, or just adding noise? In this panel from Context Conference, Najla Elmachtoub (Squadformers) moderates a sharp, no-fluff conversation with Nathen Harvey (Google, DORA program), Bill Harding (GitClear), and Jeremy Castile (GitKraken) on what's really working when it comes to AI and developer experience.

The options within Test Data Management - Enterprise, DIY or Redgate

Compliance Without Compromise: Test Data Management That Finally Fits You know you shouldn't have sensitive production data in test environments. But every time you look at fixing it, the options feel impossible: enterprise tools that cost six figures and take months to implement, or DIY scripts that sort of work until they don't. So, it stays on the backlog.

Every pilot is ready for engine failure: are your engineers? w/ Hamed Silatani (Uptime Labs)

Every pilot who's never had an engine failure is still ready for one. The same can't be said for most software engineers facing their first major incident. Hamed Silatani, co-founder and CEO of Uptime Labs, and former Head of Reliability Engineering at IG Group, has spent two decades watching engineers learn incident response the hard way: alone, under pressure, with no training.

The Compliance Gap in Test Data Management

Compliance Without Compromise: Test Data Management That Finally Fits You know you shouldn't have sensitive production data in test environments. But every time you look at fixing it, the options feel impossible: enterprise tools that cost six figures and take months to implement, or DIY scripts that sort of work until they don't. So, it stays on the backlog.