We had the pleasure of meeting Ponmani Palanisamy, a Staff Site Reliability Engineer at LinkedIn, at a recent SRE Meetup in Bangalore. Ponmani gave an insightful talk on "Improving data redundancy and rebalancing data in HDFS." We were captivated by his talk and eager to learn more about his experience in the reliability space. We talked about everything including his journey, experiences, and of course, his most memorable war room stories over a steady career of 17 years. Here's what he had to share.

Let's face it, running a high-growth company is exhilarating! You're constantly innovating, customer demand is soaring, and the future feels limitless. But with that growth comes a unique set of challenges you need to navigate to stay ahead of the curve. Let’s say, your development team is churning out new features at breakneck speed. That's fantastic! But can your operations team keep up with deploying them to production? What about potential bugs or security vulnerabilities?

In this article we will cover the top 25 SRE interview questions to help you prepare for you next SRE interview. As customer demand for reliable and high-performing services continues to grow, the role of Site Reliability Engineers (SRE’s) continues to grow in importance. Whether you are a seasoned SRE or a recent graduate preparing for an SRE interview, these questions will be invaluable for determining your level of expertise and understanding where you need to grow.

In the past, software development was all about hitting deadlines and budgets. But times have changed. Today, users expect flawless, 24/7 experiences that drive business value. That's why building reliable and resilient systems is no longer a luxury - it's a necessity.

Organizations prioritize Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to achieve optimal performance. However, understanding the differences between KPIs and SLAs can be challenging. In this blog, we discuss everything about Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Service Level Agreements (SLAs), and the key differences between KPIs vs SLAs.

In the bustling marketplace of the internet, your website is your meticulously curated storefront. It's where you present your products or services to potential customers and aim to make a lasting impression. Just like any well-stocked shop, constant upkeep is essential. Empty shelves, dusty displays, and expired products can send shoppers scurrying straight to your competitors.

Organizations are constantly challenged by the threat of IT incidents, cyberattacks and breaches. Incidents such as data breaches, malware infections, and system outages can have devastating consequences for businesses, including financial losses, reputational damage, and legal liabilities. In response to these threats, many organizations are turning to incident response platforms to streamline their incident management processes and enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Enterprises face a constant challenge: how to deliver technical solutions quickly without compromising on quality. In the race to innovate and stay ahead of the competition, the pressure to accelerate delivery can sometimes overshadow the importance of maintaining high standards of quality and reliability. However, striking the right balance between speed and quality is crucial for the long-term success and sustainability of enterprise platforms.

System uptime is a fundamental necessity for every organization that gives importance to the customer experience and satisfaction. A single minute of downtime can trigger a cascade of negative consequences, impacting everything from revenue streams to customer loyalty. So, why exactly is system uptime important? Downtime translates to lost revenue, frustrated users, and operational disruption.

Incidents are inevitable. From software failures to service disruptions, unexpected events can disrupt the smooth functioning of systems and processes, causing frustration for users and impacting business operations. However, what separates successful organizations from the rest is not the absence of incidents, but rather their approach to handling and learning from them.