Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Since 2016, when Microsoft announced its intention to make Linux a first class citizen in its ecosystem, Canonical and Microsoft have been working hand in hand to make that vision a reality. Ubuntu was among the first distributions to support the preview of SQL Server on Linux. Ubuntu was the first distribution offered in the launch of Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL), and it remains the default to this day. Ubuntu was also the first Linux distribution to support Azure’s Confidential VMs.

Modern application security is struggling to keep up with AI-driven development and cloud-native scale, especially when security feels bolted onto CI/CD instead of built in. Harness SAST and SCA bring AI-powered application security testing natively into the Harness platform, reducing noise and alert fatigue. By identifying only vulnerabilities that are actually reachable in production code, teams get findings they can trust and act on faster.

The BCG recently released a report on the cost of cloud. The findings? Hyperscalers are charging up to 30% more for their sovereign-cloud offerings. It supports an earlier notion that if you want control, compliance, and jurisdictional certainty, you have to pay a premium. At Civo, we think that is broken. As data volumes grow and AI workloads become central to business strategy, the economics of cloud computing are being re-examined.

Modern DevOps faces tough monitoring challenges due to distributed systems, containers, and microservices. Key issues include fragmented visibility, alert fatigue, tool overload, pipeline blindspots, and cloud cost inefficiencies.

Cloud monitoring is essential for tracking performance, security, and costs in dynamic environments. With 94% of enterprises using cloud services and 81% adopting multi-cloud setups, maintaining control is critical. Here's what you need to know.

After three decades of working with databases, one thing I’ve seen over and over is this: we don’t treat our development and test environments with the same respect we do our production systems. Not because people don’t care. Far from it. It’s usually because teams are under pressure, everyone’s juggling multiple priorities, and the quickest path forward often wins the day.

Teams that find a weekly rotation too long and a daily rotation too short often end up choosing between 2-day and 4-day rotations. This guide compares both these rotations across three key criteria. For each criterion, we have discussed how it works for 2-day and 4-day rotations and recommended what to choose when. To make it easy, we also included a comparison table for a quick overview. This gives you all the information you need at a glance. Let’s dive in! Table of contents.