Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

I was looking at our Claude Code spend in the Anthropic console the other day. Aggregate cost, aggregate tokens — no breakdown by developer, no breakdown by session. I knew my Hackathon team had been using it heavily on building out new features for the OpenTelemetry Distro Builder. But heavily how? I had no idea. Turns out Claude Code has been emitting OpenTelemetry signals the whole time. Per-session cost, token counts, every tool call it makes on your codebase.

Enterprise IT leaders face a persistent contradiction. Digital systems grow more complex each year, but operational stability and resilience do not improve at the same pace. Downtime costs are only the visible part of the problem. For large enterprises, unplanned outages can run into hundreds of thousands of dollars per hour in lost revenue, productivity, and remediation effort. The harder cost to quantify is the reputational damage when critical business services fail at the worst possible time.

AI-assisted coding has evolved from a novelty into an industry standard. At ilert, we started our adoption in mid-2023, quickly realizing that success depends heavily on proper context and workflows. This is particularly acute with Rust. While the language is central to our backend infrastructure, its strict compiler rules and distinct idiomatic approaches make it notoriously difficult for modern LLMs to master.

This post is also available in German and in French. The 2026 AI landscape has shifted from "Can we build it?" to "How much will it cost to run it?" For CTOs and engineering leaders, the challenge is no longer just model performance: it is the underlying infrastructure sprawl that silently erodes margins. When AI workloads scale, they often inherit the inefficiencies of legacy cloud models: over-provisioned instances, fragmented data pipelines, and a lack of unified context.

In my time at Ivanti, I've witnessed firsthand how AI acts as a force multiplier across enterprise organizations. When deployed strategically, AI accelerates decision-making and operational execution at scale in a way that teams simply can't sustain manually. However, without clear and enforceable AI guardrails, implementing AI opens organizations up to serious new risks.