Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

What's New in InfluxDB 3.11: A Significant Performance Upgrade for Complex Time Series Workloads

Summary InfluxDB 3.11 delivers major performance and data management updates for growing time series workloads, with significantly faster queries on recent data, expanded support for wide and ultra-sparse schemas, and a more predictable resource profile under load. InfluxDB 3 Enterprise also adds backup and restore, bulk Parquet import, row-level deletes, and a built-in Explorer UI.

Eliminating Digital Friction with Nexthink Spark Episode 2: Fixing an Unresponsive Browser

Browser performance issues can disrupt productivity and create unnecessary frustration for employees. In Episode 2 of Eliminating Digital Friction with Nexthink Spark, see how Spark quickly investigates an unresponsive browser, identifies the root cause, and helps IT resolve the issue faster. Discover how AI-powered investigations enable proactive IT and deliver a better digital employee experience.

Shipped: Compare Periods, side-by-side cost comparison in Explorer

When spend moves, the first question is always “compared to what?” Answering it used to mean pulling up two tabs with two different date ranges and toggling between them, or squinting at a single delta number without the ability to customize what you’re comparing against. Compare Periods puts both periods in front of you at once, so a spike, a regression, or a shift shows up on the chart and in the cost table, without you doing the math yourself.

AI cost monitoring: what it is, how it works, and why real-time visibility matters

AI cost monitoring is the continuous tracking of AI and LLM spend in real time, broken down by the models, features, teams, and customers generating it. It is not the same as reading the monthly bill - done well, it shows spend as it happens, flags anomalies before they become invoices, and connects every dollar to an outcome so finance can protect AI ROI instead of explaining it after the fact.

Agentic AI cost: why agents burn tokens and how to control it

Agentic AI cost is what you pay to run AI agents, and it is mostly tokens. An agent does not answer once. It loops, calls tools, reads the results, and reasons again, re-sending a growing context every step. Anthropic found agents use about 4x the tokens of a chat, and multi-agent systems about 15x. You control it by capping runs, right-sizing the architecture, routing, caching, and measuring cost per task, then tying every agent to the AI ROI it produces.

Best Network Performance Monitoring Tools for Modern Enterprise Networks

Enterprise networks have outgrown the flat, predictable topologies they were built on. Traffic now crosses on-premises data centers, multiple public clouds, SD-WAN links, and the home connections of a distributed workforce. When any one of those segments degrades, the business feels it as slow applications, failed transactions, and frustrated users — long before anyone confirms the network is the cause.

CertKit Private PKI: A private certificate authority without running one yourself

In May I wrote that you probably don’t need private PKI for internal infrastructure, because DNS validation gets a publicly trusted certificate onto hosts that never touch the internet. In June I pointed out that Apple enforces an 825-day cap on private certificates, so your own CA doesn’t even free you from the browser vendors. Two days ago I told you that public client certificates stop renewing in October, and that the replacement is a private certificate authority.

GitKraken's Claude Code Plugin Is Live: No CLI Required

If you haven’t heard about our MCP server, you should really check it out. It’s probably the best way to give your agents access to the power of GitKraken’s integrations and features. Our MCP tools also help your agents understand your codebase in a way that we think lowers your token usage and improves their output.

GitKraken Code Review: A Different Way to See What a Pull Request Actually Changed

Most PR descriptions leave out the one thing a reviewer actually needs: why the change was made. And AI review bots that live natively inside GitHub tend to solve that with noise instead, dropping comments a reviewer then has to sort through to find the two that matter.