Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

When designing effective error handling for React apps, the troubleshooting information you collect and display is critical. React errors can stem from a variety of causes, including user misconfiguration, backend and network issues, and mismatches in browser environments. Instrumenting your code to log critical context, including feature names, user data, and session activity, enables you to quickly identify where these errors originate.

We run Postgres under an operator for automatic failover. That is a promise about what happens during a failure, so the only way to know you have it is to cause the failure and watch. The docs tell you what should happen. A config review tells you which knobs are set. Neither tells you how long an isolated primary keeps accepting writes after its replacement has been promoted, and that number decides whether a failover is clean or leaves you with two versions of your data.

Enterprise AI agents clear every demo and pilot, then hit a compliance wall. The gap isn't technology—it's architecture. Discover why governance must sit inside the execution flow across six control points, not bolt on afterward as an afterthought at input and output only.

How to recover deleted OneDrive files: the recycle bin, the 93-day window, restoring your whole OneDrive, and how admins get back a departed user's files.

Model Rightsizer is an open-source Claude Code sub-agent from CloudZero that scores each task on capability need versus cost pressure, then routes it to the smallest model that can handle it. In its first week, it cut Opus spend 75% while shifting 234x more work to Sonnet. Every Claude Code agent you run has to answer a question it usually never gets asked: does this task need the smartest model available, or are you paying Fable prices to rename a variable across three files?

Only 22% of finance leaders can tie their AI spend to a business outcome, according to CloudZero’s 2026 finance survey. When AI ROI falls short, it usually isn’t because a company is doing too much AI. It’s that no one is watching which model runs which task, and that one choice accounts for a large part of the cost. Here’s why it happens.

Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) have dramatically changed how we ship software. But once code reaches production, the operational work is still surprisingly manual. Engineers continually monitor systems, investigate unexpected behavior, and decide which issues require action. And that is where the next opportunity for AI-driven automation lies. For example, in today's CI/CD workflows, someone refreshes the pipeline page to see whether the queue has moved.

This month is a big one! We announced the latest major release of Redgate Flyway Enterprise, built to help teams move fast with AI without losing control of the database. Three key new capabilities also landed in preview: Flyway’s MCP server, advanced support for Databricks, and Oracle schema existence checks. And we're closing with a short, honest read on failure and what it takes to make deployments less stressful. Here's the round-up.

Running workloads across AWS, Azure, and GCP is the operational reality for most enterprise engineering teams. The challenge isn't the providers themselves, it's what happens when each one accumulates its own delivery pipeline, its own security configuration, and its own environment management tooling. What starts as provider flexibility quietly becomes provider-specific complexity, multiplied across every team that ships.

Historically, non-technical stakeholders would’ve had most of their data questions answered either through pre-built dashboards or by asking their Data team (or equivalent). Self-serve analytics tools went a step further by offering safe, governed datasets built by Data teams which let non-technical users dig into data without having to worry about how it joins together, how metrics like “revenue” are defined, and so on.